GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiencyno data0.76
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV730G92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)11 December 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speed550 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors514 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6041.60
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3264
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz820 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s52.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 11 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 135 Watt

ATI V3750 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 18% more advanced lithography process, and 181% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 512, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and GeForce 8800 GTS 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 141 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or GeForce 8800 GTS 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.