GeForce GT 520 vs ATI FirePro V3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data2.08
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV620GF119
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 August 2008 (18 years ago)13 April 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 $59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4048
Core clock speed800 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors181 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate3.2006.480
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth15.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.2
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2008 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB (DDR3)
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 29 Watt

GT 520 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3700 and GeForce GT 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 520 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate FirePro V3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 866 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3700 or GeForce GT 520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.