GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGT218S
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 March 2016 (10 years ago)12 July 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×216
Core clock speed850 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6 ×24.160
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×20.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×24
TMUs256 ×28
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×26.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

S9300 X2 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS Rev. 3, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 161 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.