Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs FirePro S9170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated28
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.27
Power efficiencyno data16.87
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameHawaiiNavi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 July 2015 (11 years ago)23 July 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28164096
Core clock speed930 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2920 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate163.7747.5
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs176256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 July 2015 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 300 Watt

FirePro S9170 has 9% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9170 and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9170 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.