GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs FirePro S9050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S9050 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S9050
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
11.69
RTX 4070 Ti
2023, $799
12 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
75.16
+543%

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms S9050 by a whopping 543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.40
Power efficiency4.0520.57
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiAD104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2014 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927680
Core clock speed900 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8626.4
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs112240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache448 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache768 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length254 mm285 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S9050 11.69
RTX 4070 Ti 75.16
+543%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9050 4901
Samples: 2
RTX 4070 Ti 31508
+543%
Samples: 15798

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−86.5%
223
1440p21−24
−85%
140
4K12−1486
+617%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.58
1440pno data5.71
4Kno data9.29

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 236 236
Hogwarts Legacy 160 160
Resident Evil 4 Remake 292 292

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 218 218
Far Cry 5 211 211
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 147 147
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 185 185
Dota 2 259 259
Far Cry 5 203 203
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 178 178
Hogwarts Legacy 126 126
Metro Exodus 197 197
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 453 453
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 167 167
Dota 2 243 243
Far Cry 5 189 189
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 118 118
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221 221
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 240−250 240−250
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 156 156
Metro Exodus 131 131
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 105 105
Far Cry 5 182 182
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280
Hogwarts Legacy 86 86
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210 200−210

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Grand Theft Auto V 172 172
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 65−70
Metro Exodus 84 84
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149 149
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 48 48
Dota 2 226 226
Far Cry 5 111 111
Forza Horizon 4 240−250 240−250
Hogwarts Legacy 47 47
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how FirePro S9050 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 643% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 567% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 617% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.69 75.16
Recency 7 August 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 285 Watt

FirePro S9050 has 21% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 543% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 86% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9050 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S9050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8591 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9050 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.