GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro S9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1630 1650 1650 GDDR6 1650 SUPER 1650 TU106 1650 TU116

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S9000 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S9000
2012, $2,499
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
12.14

GTX 1650 outperforms S9000 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
GTX 1650 GTX 1650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454329
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4423.36
Power efficiency4.1719.48
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 August 2012 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1650 has 5209% better value for money than FirePro S9000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792896
Core clock speed900 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate100.893.24
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11256
L1 Cache448 KB896 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S9000 12.14
GTX 1650 18.89
+55.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9000 5059
Samples: 6
GTX 1650 7869
+55.5%
Samples: 37343

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−74.3%
61
+74.3%
1440p24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%
4K14−16
−71.4%
24
+71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p71.40
−2823%
2.44
+2823%
1440p104.13
−2556%
3.92
+2556%
4K178.50
−2775%
6.21
+2775%
  • GTX 1650 has 2823% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 has 2556% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 has 2775% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 211
+0%
211
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
+0%
90
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Fortnite 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+0%
83
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 260
+0%
260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 70
+0%
70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 177
+0%
177
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 42
+0%
42
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 83
+0%
83
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 11
+0%
11
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how FirePro S9000 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 74% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 58% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.14 18.89
Recency 24 August 2012 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro S9000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 56% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 367% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S9000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
ATI 9500 PRO 9500 PRO
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
GTX 260 GTX 260
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
6800 GT 6800 GT
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
9100M G mGPU 9100M G mGPU Intel
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
9500 GS Rev. 2 9500 GS Rev. 2
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
GRID A100B GRID A100B
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
FirePro S9000 S9000
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28472 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9000 or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.