GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs FirePro S7150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S7150 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S7150
2016, $2,399
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.05
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025
12 GB GDDR7, 60 Watt
53.73
+494%

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms S7150 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency4.6769.26
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTongaGB205
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 February 2016 (10 years ago)March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20485888
Core clock speed920 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1447 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate117.8266.2
Floating-point processing power3.768 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs128184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache512 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S7150 9.05
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 53.73
+494%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S7150 3770
Samples: 7
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 22386
+494%
Samples: 3018

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−548%
136
+548%
1440p12−14
−567%
80
+567%
4K9−10
−533%
57
+533%

Cost per frame, $

1080p114.24no data
1440p199.92no data
4K266.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 155
+0%
155
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 244
+0%
244
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 341
+0%
341
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 142
+0%
142
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130
+0%
130
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how FirePro S7150 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 548% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 567% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 533% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.05 53.73
Recency 1 February 2016 on March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 494% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S7150 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S7150 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 510 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.