GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs FirePro S7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560M 560M SLI 570M 580M 580M SLI 780M 850M 860M 950M 960M 970M 980M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S7000 with GeForce GTX 560M SLI, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S7000
2012, $1,249
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
11.36
+86.8%

S7000 outperforms 560M SLI by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking473652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Power efficiency5.864.71
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePitcairnN12E-GS
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 August 2012 (14 years ago)6 January 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed950 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length292 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortno data
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.36 6.08
Recency 27 August 2012 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 100 Watt

FirePro S7000 has a 87% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 560M SLI, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The FirePro S7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
GTX 850A GTX 850A
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
RX 6700S RX 6700S
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 112EU Mobile
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3850 Radeon HD 3850
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 16 votes

Rate FirePro S7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7000 or GeForce GTX 560M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.