GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.89

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms S10000 by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47788
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency2.2570.77
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTahitiGB206
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)April 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×24608
Core clock speed825 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2205.2
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×213.13 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×248
TMUs112 ×2144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache448 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache768 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.89
RTX 5070 Mobile 45.74
+320%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
Samples: 8
RTX 5070 Mobile 19057
+320%
Samples: 3137

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−367%
112
+367%
1440p14−16
−336%
61
+336%
4K9−10
−344%
40
+344%

Cost per frame, $

1080p149.96no data
1440p257.07no data
4K399.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 117
+0%
117
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how S10000 and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 367% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 336% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 344% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.89 45.74
Recency 12 November 2012 on April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 5070 Mobile has a 320% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S10000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 548 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.