GeForce RTX 5060 vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.84

RTX 5060 outperforms S10000 by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48471
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25100.00
Power efficiency2.2526.44
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTahitiGB206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)19 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 5060 has 39900% better value for money than S10000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×23840
Core clock speed825 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2497 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2299.6
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×219.18 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×248
TMUs112 ×2120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache448 KB3.8 MB
L2 Cache768 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length305 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.84
RTX 5060 49.25
+354%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
Samples: 8
RTX 5060 20604
+354%
Samples: 17413

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−79.7%
148
1440p14−1668
+386%
4K10−1248
+380%

Cost per frame, $

1080p119.972.02
+98.3%
1440p257.074.40
+98.3%
4K359.906.23
+98.3%
  • RTX 5060 has 98% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 has 98% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5060 has 98% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 150−160 150−160
Counter-Strike 2 260−270 260−270
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130 120−130
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140−150 140−150

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 150−160 150−160
Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Counter-Strike 2 260−270 260−270
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130 120−130
Far Cry 5 247 247
Fortnite 210−220 210−220
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 190−200
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 280−290 280−290

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 150−160 150−160
Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Counter-Strike 2 260−270 260−270
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130 120−130
Far Cry 5 225 225
Fortnite 210−220 210−220
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 190−200
Grand Theft Auto V 180 180
Metro Exodus 120−130 120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 280 280
Valorant 280−290 280−290

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130 120−130
Far Cry 5 212 212
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 190−200
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 142
Valorant 280−290 280−290

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220 210−220

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 350−400
Grand Theft Auto V 131 131
Metro Exodus 75−80 75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 60−65
Far Cry 5 144 144
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106 106

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 60−65
Grand Theft Auto V 124 124
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 89
Valorant 290−300 290−300

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 80−85
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 30−33
Far Cry 5 74 74
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 100−110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 80−85

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 70−75

This is how S10000 and RTX 5060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is 393% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 is 386% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5060 is 380% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 49.25
Recency 12 November 2012 19 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 145 Watt

RTX 5060 has a 354% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 82% more advanced lithography process, and 81% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S10000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8364 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.