GeForce RTX 4090 vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.84
RTX 4090
2022, $1,599
24 GB GDDR6X, 450 Watt
90.89
+738%

RTX 4090 outperforms S10000 by a whopping 738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2530.69
Power efficiency2.2515.71
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiAD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)20 September 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4090 has 12176% better value for money than S10000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×216384
Core clock speed825 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×21,290.2
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×282.58 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×2176
TMUs112 ×2512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128
L1 Cache448 KB16 MB
L2 Cache768 KB72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×224 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×21.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.84
RTX 4090 90.89
+738%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
Samples: 8
RTX 4090 38023
+738%
Samples: 22829

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−89%
246
1440p21−24
−88.6%
184
4K14−16
−89.6%
134

Cost per frame, $

1080p133.306.50
+95.1%
1440p171.388.69
+94.9%
4K257.0711.93
+95.4%
  • RTX 4090 has 95% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 has 95% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 has 95% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 227 227
Hogwarts Legacy 204 204
Resident Evil 4 Remake 351 351

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Cyberpunk 2077 224 224
Far Cry 5 209 209
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 181 181
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 215 215
Dota 2 253 253
Far Cry 5 201 201
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 174 174
Hogwarts Legacy 159 159
Metro Exodus 230 230
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 578 578
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 211 211
Dota 2 224 224
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 159 159
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 305 305
Valorant 680 680

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 312 312
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 162 162
Metro Exodus 180 180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 159 159
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 142 142
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 262 262

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 166 166
Grand Theft Auto V 187 187
Hogwarts Legacy 102 102
Metro Exodus 137 137
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 281 281
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 81 81
Dota 2 227 227
Far Cry 5 170 170
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 86 86
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how S10000 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 811% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 776% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 857% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 90.89
Recency 12 November 2012 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 450 Watt

RTX 4090 has a 738% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 82% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S10000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18248 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce RTX 4090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.