UHD Graphics vs ATI FirePro RG220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated685
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Power efficiencyno data39.92
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV711Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 May 2008 (18 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00012.00
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro RG220 and UHD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro RG220 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10787 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro RG220 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.