GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated775
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.71
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBlackcombGF116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2011 (15 years ago)15 March 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960192
Core clock speed680 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt116 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rate32.6428.80
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs4832
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/a16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz4.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s98.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.2
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 116 Watt

FirePro M8900 has 55% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 60054 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or GeForce GTX 550 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.