GRID K260Q vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.40
Power efficiencyno data2.43
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBlackcombGK104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2011 (15 years ago)28 June 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$937

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9601536
Core clock speed680 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6495.36
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs48128
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 225 Watt

FirePro M8900 has 200% lower power consumption.

GRID K260Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and GRID K260Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or GRID K260Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.