GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI FirePro M7740
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro M7740 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms M7740 by a whopping 3739% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 949 | 10 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 55.64 |
| Power efficiency | 2.57 | 20.74 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | M97 | AD103 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 (17 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $799 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 8448 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 2340 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2610 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 826 million | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 285 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 689.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.832 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 96 |
| TMUs | 32 | 264 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 264 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 66 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 8.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 310 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 846 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 672.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5−6
−4340%
| 222
+4340%
|
| 1440p | 3−4
−4767%
| 146
+4767%
|
| 4K | 2−3
−4300%
| 88
+4300%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 3.60 |
| 1440p | no data | 5.47 |
| 4K | no data | 9.08 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−8125%
|
300−350
+8125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4825%
|
197
+4825%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−3417%
|
210−220
+3417%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 1−2
−24200%
|
240−250
+24200%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3760%
|
190−200
+3760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−8125%
|
300−350
+8125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4800%
|
196
+4800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−3960%
|
203
+3960%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−3256%
|
300−350
+3256%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−3070%
|
300−350
+3070%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−3417%
|
210−220
+3417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1473%
|
170−180
+1473%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1128%
|
450−500
+1128%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3760%
|
190−200
+3760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−8125%
|
300−350
+8125%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−578%
|
270−280
+578%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4200%
|
172
+4200%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−3536%
|
800−850
+3536%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−3840%
|
197
+3840%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−3256%
|
300−350
+3256%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−3070%
|
300−350
+3070%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−5700%
|
174
+5700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−6433%
|
196
+6433%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−3417%
|
210−220
+3417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1473%
|
170−180
+1473%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−5275%
|
430
+5275%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1128%
|
450−500
+1128%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3760%
|
190−200
+3760%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3850%
|
158
+3850%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−3536%
|
800−850
+3536%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−3660%
|
188
+3660%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−3070%
|
300−350
+3070%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1473%
|
170−180
+1473%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−2525%
|
210
+2525%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1128%
|
450−500
+1128%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−3256%
|
300−350
+3256%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−3417%
|
210−220
+3417%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−6125%
|
240−250
+6125%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−3586%
|
500−550
+3586%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
−775%
|
170−180
+775%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−3364%
|
450−500
+3364%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−10300%
|
104
+10300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−9250%
|
187
+9250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−5540%
|
280−290
+5540%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−5200%
|
159
+5200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−4933%
|
150−160
+4933%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−5100%
|
150−160
+5100%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1113%
|
182
+1113%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−3090%
|
300−350
+3090%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−3650%
|
150−160
+3650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 119 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 240−250 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2533%
|
75−80
+2533%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 155
+0%
|
155
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 131
+0%
|
131
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 84
+0%
|
84
+0%
|
| Palworld | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Palworld | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
This is how ATI M7740 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 4340% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 4767% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 4300% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 24200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER performs better in 49 tests (82%)
- there's a draw in 11 tests (18%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.99 | 76.40 |
| Recency | 4 August 2009 | 8 January 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 285 Watt |
ATI M7740 has 375% lower power consumption.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 3739% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro M7740 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
