Quadro NVS 285 vs FirePro M4170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M4170 with Quadro NVS 285, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M4170
2015
1 GB GDDR5
2.84
+2482%

M4170 outperforms NVS 285 by a whopping 2482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8451528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.47
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameOpalNV44 A2
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 April 2015 (11 years ago)6 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$27.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed825 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601.100
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs244
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)3.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M4170 2.84
+2482%
NVS 285 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4170 1182
+2586%
Samples: 26
NVS 285 44
Samples: 149

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 0.11
Recency 23 April 2015 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

FirePro M4170 has a 2482% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M4170 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4170 or Quadro NVS 285, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.