Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking768not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.95no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameChelseaTU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2012 (14 years ago)13 August 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed675 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60466.6
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache128 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 260 Watt

FirePro M4000 has 688% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 25 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or Quadro RTX 8000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.