Quadro T1200 Mobile vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.93

T1200 Mobile outperforms D700 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6575.21
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed850 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate108.891.20
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12864
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−45%
58
+45%
1440p24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
4K55−60
−47.3%
81
+47.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 45% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 47% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.93 17.50
Recency 18 January 2014 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 18 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 35% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 1422% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
FirePro V5900 V5900
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
FireStream 9170 9170
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 940 940
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
7800 GS 20Pipes AGP 7800 GS 20Pipes AGP
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
7800 GS 24Pipes AGP 7800 GS 24Pipes AGP
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile 16EU Mobile
Sky 500 AMD Sky 500
vs
ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP IIC AGP
Sky 500 AMD Sky 500
vs
7800 GTX 512 7800 GTX 512
Sky 500 AMD Sky 500
vs
Pro WX 3200 3200
Sky 500 AMD Sky 500
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 40 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 170 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.