GeForce MX150 vs FirePro D700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro D700 with GeForce MX150, including specs and performance data.
D700 outperforms MX150 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 440 | 680 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.66 | 41.82 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | GP108 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 January 2014 (12 years ago) | 17 May 2017 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1038 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 | 24.91 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.482 TFLOPS | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1370 MHz | 1253 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 60−65
+122%
| 27 |
| 1440p | 70−75
+133%
| 30 |
| 4K | 40−45
+122%
| 18 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 9−10 | 9−10 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 39 | 39 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11 | 11 |
| Far Cry 5 | 17 | 17 |
| Fortnite | 59 | 59 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 25 | 25 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 26 | 26 |
| Valorant | 100 | 100 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 32 | 32 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 87 | 87 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7 | 7 |
| Dota 2 | 68 | 68 |
| Far Cry 5 | 16 | 16 |
| Far Cry 6 | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| Fortnite | 34 | 34 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21 | 21 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 26 | 26 |
| Metro Exodus | 6 | 6 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 22 | 22 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 19 | 19 |
| Valorant | 100 | 100 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 26 | 26 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| Dota 2 | 62 | 62 |
| Far Cry 5 | 14 | 14 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14 | 14 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 15 | 15 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 11 | 11 |
| Valorant | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24 | 24 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 55 | 55 |
| Far Cry 6 | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 43 | 43 |
| Valorant | 66 | 66 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8 | 7−8 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 10−12 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30 | 30 |
| Far Cry 6 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Valorant | 33 | 33 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 24 | 24 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6 | 5−6 |
This is how FirePro D700 and GeForce MX150 compete in popular games:
- FirePro D700 is 122% faster in 1080p
- FirePro D700 is 133% faster in 1440p
- FirePro D700 is 122% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.89 | 5.37 |
| Recency | 18 January 2014 | 17 May 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 10 Watt |
FirePro D700 has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GeForce MX150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 96% lower power consumption.
The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX150 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
