GeForce GTX 780M SLI vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with GeForce GTX 780M SLI, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.93

780M SLI outperforms D700 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
GTX 780M SLI GTX 780M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.656.95
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTahitiN14E-GTX
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)30 May 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed850 MHz823 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million7080 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate108.8no data
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2x 4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−41.4%
99
+41.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 257
+0%
257
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and GTX 780M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M SLI is 41% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.93 17.96
Recency 18 January 2014 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 200 Watt

FirePro D700 has an age advantage of 7 months.

GTX 780M SLI, on the other hand, has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, and 37% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
GTX 780M SLI GeForce GTX 780M SLI
vs
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
FirePro D500 D500
vs
W4170M W4170M
FirePro D500 D500
vs
ATI HD 2600 XT AGP HD 2600 XT AGP
FirePro D500 D500
vs
Pro 5300M Pro 5300M
FirePro D500 D500
vs
RTX 5060 RTX 5060
FirePro D700 D700
vs
R9 M395 R9 M395
FirePro D700 D700
vs
FX 5900 ZT FX 5900 ZT
FirePro D700 D700
vs
ATI FireGL V3400 FireGL V3400
FirePro D700 D700
vs
Quadro P620 P620
FirePro D700 D700
vs
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
Sky 500 Sky 500
vs
Pro 5500M Pro 5500M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 40 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or GeForce GTX 780M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.