Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs FirePro A320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.45
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTrinity GLTU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date6 June 2012 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed955 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate22.92259.2
Floating-point processing power0.7334 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 6 years, a 167% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A320 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro A320 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro A320 or Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.