ATI Radeon HD 3200 vs FirePro 2270
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro 2270 with Radeon HD 3200, including specs and performance data.
2270 outperforms HD 3200 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1388 | 1480 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.76 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Cedar | RS780 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 January 2011 (15 years ago) | 4 March 2008 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 494 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 180 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 4.800 | 1.976 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.096 TFLOPS | 0.03952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5−6
+66.7%
| 3 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 2−3 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Valorant | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 1−2 |
This is how FirePro 2270 and ATI HD 3200 compete in popular games:
- FirePro 2270 is 67% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 24 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 31 January 2011 | 4 March 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
FirePro 2270 has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.
The FirePro 2270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro 2270 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
