GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs FirePro 2270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro 2270 with GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

FirePro 2270
2011
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.34
GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.43
+321%

650M Mac Edition outperforms 2270 by a whopping 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13801048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.752.46
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCedarGK107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 January 2011 (15 years ago)12 July 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80384
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80028.80
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L1 Cache8 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1254 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s80.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 1.43
Recency 31 January 2011 12 July 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

FirePro 2270 has 200% lower power consumption.

GT 650M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 321% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro 2270 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 or GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.