Iris Plus Graphics vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.97
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV516Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2007 (19 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors105 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40032.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x1
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 496 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.