Radeon E8870 MXM vs ATI FireMV 2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV370Saturn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2006 (20 years ago)29 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed324 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors107 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.29648.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs448
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed392 MBps1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.136 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 has 400% lower power consumption.

E8870 MXM, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 and Radeon E8870 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2200 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E8870 MXM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8870 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2200 or Radeon E8870 MXM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.