ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP vs ATI FireMV 2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV370RS880
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2006 (20 years ago)1 May 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed324 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors107 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2962.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed392 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.136 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 9 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4225 IGP has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 and Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2200 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2200 or Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.