Apple M4 32-core GPU vs ATI FireGL X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)no data
GPU code nameR300no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (24 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed325 MHzno data
Number of transistors110 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed310 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 150 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 45 Watt

ATI FireGL X1-256 has 22% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 32-core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and M4 32-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M4 32-core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 32 votes

Rate M4 32-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X1-256 or M4 32-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.