GeForce 8800 Ultra vs ATI FireGL V8650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data0.70
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR600G80
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (19 years ago)2 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 $829

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320612
Core clock speed688 MHz612 MHz
Number of transistors720 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data171 Watt
Texture fill rate11.0139.17
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPS0.3871 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1632
L2 Cache256 KB96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mm270 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed868 MHz1080 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/s103.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm

ATI FireGL V8650 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8650 and GeForce 8800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8650 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V8650 or GeForce 8800 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.