Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs ATI FireGL V7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameR600Crestline
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 November 2007 (18 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2408
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt13.5 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12no data
TMUs12no data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2007 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 13 Watt

ATI FireGL V7600 has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, on the other hand, has 877% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7600 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7600 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7600 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.