Quadro RTX 8000 vs ATI FireGL V7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated81
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.90
Power efficiencyno data13.99
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR520TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)13 August 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed594 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors321 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)97 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate9.504509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed648 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.47 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 97 Watt 260 Watt

ATI FireGL V7300 has 168% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7300 and Quadro RTX 8000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 489 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7300 or Quadro RTX 8000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.