Arc A750 vs ATI FireGL V3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.42
Power efficiencyno data10.43
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV370DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed391 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors107 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.564537.6
Floating-point processing powerno data17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed196 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.136 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm

Arc A750 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3100 and Arc A750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1079 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3100 or Arc A750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.