Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Extreme Graphics 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.70
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameMontaraIce Lake G4 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 December 2003 (22 years ago)28 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed266 MHz1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.27no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012_1
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2003 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics 2 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics 2 or Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.