Radeon RX 7700 XT vs CMP 40HX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared CMP 40HX with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.
7700 XT outperforms CMP 40HX by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 266 | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 84 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.13 | 72.65 |
| Power efficiency | 10.04 | 17.28 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | TU106 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 February 2021 (5 years ago) | 25 August 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
RX 7700 XT has 553% better value for money than CMP 40HX.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 3456 |
| Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1435 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 2544 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 245 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 237.6 | 549.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.603 TFLOPS | 35.17 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| TMUs | 144 | 216 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 54 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 864 KB |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 80−85
−56.8%
| 185 |
| 1440p | 40−45
−60.8%
| 102 |
| 4K | 24−27 | 59
+146%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 8.74 | 2.43
+72.2%
|
| 1440p | 17.48 | 4.40
+74.8%
|
| 4K | 29.13 | 7.61
+73.9%
|
- RX 7700 XT has 72% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- RX 7700 XT has 75% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- RX 7700 XT has 74% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 265 | 265 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 351 | 351 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 193 | 193 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 229 | 229 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 199 | 199 |
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 344 | 344 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 158 | 158 |
| Far Cry 5 | 188 | 188 |
| Fortnite | 240−250 | 240−250 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 278 | 278 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 119 | 119 |
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 243 | 243 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | 270−280 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 132 | 132 |
| Far Cry 5 | 181 | 181 |
| Fortnite | 240−250 | 240−250 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 272 | 272 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 166 | 166 |
| Metro Exodus | 152 | 152 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 295 | 295 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 122 | 122 |
| Far Cry 5 | 167 | 167 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 231 | 231 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 168 | 168 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 240−250 | 240−250 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 127 | 127 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 400−450 | 400−450 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 105 | 105 |
| Metro Exodus | 90 | 90 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| Valorant | 350−400 | 350−400 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80 | 80 |
| Far Cry 5 | 157 | 157 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 197 | 197 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 120 | 120 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 31 | 31 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 112 | 112 |
| Metro Exodus | 57 | 57 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 89 | 89 |
| Valorant | 300−350 | 300−350 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 36 | 36 |
| Far Cry 5 | 82 | 82 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 134 | 134 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100 | 95−100 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80 | 75−80 |
This is how CMP 40HX and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:
- RX 7700 XT is 131% faster in 1080p
- RX 7700 XT is 155% faster in 1440p
- RX 7700 XT is 146% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.87 | 54.40 |
| Recency | 25 February 2021 | 25 August 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 245 Watt |
CMP 40HX has 24% lower power consumption.
RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 128% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 58% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.
Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
