Arc 7-Core iGPU vs CMP 40HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 40HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 RTX 8000 T1000 T400 T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB Tesla T4 Tesla T10 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 40HX with Arc 7-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

CMP 40HX
2021, $699
8 GB GDDR6, 185 Watt
26.00
+70.5%

CMP 40HX outperforms 7-Core iGPU by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking255392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.62no data
Power efficiency10.95no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameTU106Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2021 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23047
Core clock speed1470 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Wattno data
Texture fill rate237.6no data
Floating-point processing power7.603 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MB1.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+57.1%
35

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90 90
Cyberpunk 2077 32 32
Hogwarts Legacy 31 31
Resident Evil 4 Remake 36 36

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 58 58
Cyberpunk 2077 27 27
Far Cry 5 39 39
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 65−70
Hogwarts Legacy 27 27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 31 31
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 23 23
Far Cry 5 36 36
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 65−70
Grand Theft Auto V 24 24
Hogwarts Legacy 17 17
Metro Exodus 30−35 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 48
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 22 22
Far Cry 5 35 35
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 65−70
Hogwarts Legacy 13 13
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23 23
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 85−90

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33 30−33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 110−120
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 24−27
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 130−140
Valorant 140−150 140−150

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 14−16
Far Cry 5 30−35 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 21−24

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 35−40

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 27−30
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 9−10
Metro Exodus 12−14 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 21−24
Valorant 75−80 75−80

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 6−7
Far Cry 5 16−18 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 27−30
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 14−16

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 14−16

This is how CMP 40HX and Arc 7-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • CMP 40HX is 57% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.00 15.25
Recency 25 February 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

CMP 40HX has a 70% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 7-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 58% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 40HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 7-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
Pro SSG Radeon Pro SSG
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7 Core iGPU
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
RTX 3080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max 38-Core GPU
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
vs
RTX A4500 Max-Q RTX A4500 Max-Q
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
vs
Arc B390 Arc B390
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
PG506-232 PG506 232
vs
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Embedded RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Embedded
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 40HX or Arc 7-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.