Radeon 760M vs CMP 30HX

Place in the ranking	410	446
Place by popularity	not in top-100	90
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.60	no data
Power efficiency	8.99	65.77
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	TU116	Phoenix
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 February 2021 (5 years ago)	31 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	512
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	83.17
Floating-point processing power	5.027 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	88	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8
L0 Cache	no data	128 KB
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	128 KB
L2 Cache	1536 KB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Motherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

CMP 30HX 14.44
+13.9%

Radeon 760M 12.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

CMP 30HX 6042
+13.9%

Samples: 38

Radeon 760M 5305
Samples: 2708

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 +3.4%	29
1440p	18−21 +0%	18

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.63	no data
1440p	44.39	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	39	39
Counter-Strike 2	105	105
Cyberpunk 2077	30	30
Resident Evil 4 Remake	24	24

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	29	29
Battlefield 5	55−60	55−60
Counter-Strike 2	77	77
Cyberpunk 2077	24	24
Far Cry 5	38	38
Fortnite	70−75	70−75
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	17	17
Battlefield 5	55−60	55−60
Counter-Strike 2	33	33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	180−190	180−190
Cyberpunk 2077	18	18
Dota 2	85−90	85−90
Far Cry 5	35	35
Fortnite	70−75	70−75
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	55−60
Grand Theft Auto V	36	36
Metro Exodus	27−30	27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38	38
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60	55−60
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	27−30
Dota 2	85−90	85−90
Far Cry 5	33	33
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23	23
Valorant	100−110	100−110

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

70−75

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	16	16
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	95−100	95−100
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20	18−20
Metro Exodus	14−16	14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90	85−90
Valorant	120−130	120−130

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	10−12
Far Cry 5	27−30	27−30
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20	18−20

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

4K
High

Atomic Heart	10−11	10−11
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	9−10
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27	24−27
Metro Exodus	9−10	9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	16−18
Valorant	60−65	60−65

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20	18−20
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	9−10
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	4−5
Dota 2	45−50	45−50
Far Cry 5	12−14	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14	12−14