GeForce GTX 1630 vs Arctic Sound-M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.33
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameArctic SoundTU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2022 (4 years ago)28 June 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8192512
Core clock speed900 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate230.457.12
Floating-point processing power14.75 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs12816
TMUs25632
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 75 Watt

Arctic Sound-M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has 567% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and GeForce GTX 1630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound-M is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1523 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound-M or GeForce GTX 1630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.