Arc B370 vs Arctic Sound-M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data63.25
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameArctic SoundPanther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2022 (4 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81921280
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate230.496.00
Floating-point processing power14.75 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs12820
TMUs25640
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 25 Watt

Arc B370 has a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound-M is a workstation graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 6 votes

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound-M or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.