Arc B390 vs Arctic Sound 2T

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.75
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameArctic SoundPanther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2021 (5 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×21536
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0 ×2120.0
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×27.68 TFLOPS
ROPs120 ×224
TMUs240 ×248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 80 Watt

Arc B390 has a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and Arc B390. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while Arc B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or Arc B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.