Rubin Ultra GPU vs Arc Pro B60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.59no data
Power efficiency13.99no data
ArchitectureXe2-HPG (2025−2026)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameBMG-G21GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256057344
Core clock speed2000 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors19,600 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate384.04,062.5
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs8024
TMUs1601792
Tensor Coresno data1792
Ray Tracing Cores20no data
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cache10 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount24 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2375 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth456.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 3600 Watt

Arc Pro B60 has 1700% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 4167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Pro B60 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 31 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Pro B60 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.