Arc B580 vs Arc Pro A60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Pro A60 with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Arc Pro A60
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.52

B580 outperforms Pro A60 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266138
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data91.46
Power efficiency14.0015.67
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameDG2-256BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2023 (3 years ago)13 December 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed900 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate262.4427.2
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs128160
Tensor Cores256160
Ray Tracing Cores1620
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cache12 MB18 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Pro A60 23.52
Arc B580 38.49
+63.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Pro A60 9797
Samples: 13
Arc B580 16037
+63.7%
Samples: 3573

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−68.6%
118
+68.6%
1440p35−40
−80%
63
+80%
4K21−24
−85.7%
39
+85.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.11
1440pno data3.95
4Kno data6.38

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 112
+0%
112
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 177
+0%
177
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 236
+0%
236
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 78
+0%
78
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Arc Pro A60 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 69% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 86% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.52 38.49
Recency 6 June 2023 13 December 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 190 Watt

Arc Pro A60 has 46% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A60 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Pro A60 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 25 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1436 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Pro A60 or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.