Tesla S2050 vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8448 ×4
Core clock speedno data574 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data900 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.14 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data48 ×4
TMUsno data56 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB3 GB ×4
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedno data773 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data148.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 40 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has an age advantage of 13 years, a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.