Rubin Ultra GPU vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores857344
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistorsno data670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data3600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4,062.5
Floating-point processing powerno data260 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data1792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xHBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus widthno data32768 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.1 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB

Rubin Ultra GPU has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.