Arc Pro B70 vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V with Arc Pro B70, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
12.33
Arc Pro B70
2026, $949
32 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
45.44
+269%

Pro B70 outperforms Graphics 140V by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking45091
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.56
Power efficiencyno data15.28
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUBMG-G31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)26 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$949

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84096
Core clock speedno data2280 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rateno data716.8
Floating-point processing powerno data22.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140V 12.33
Arc Pro B70 45.44
+269%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5137
Samples: 4353
Arc Pro B70 18932
+269%
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
−259%
140−150
+259%
1440p24
−254%
85−90
+254%
4K19
−268%
70−75
+268%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.78
1440pno data11.16
4Kno data13.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 87
−245%
300−310
+245%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Palworld 65
−254%
230−240
+254%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 47
−262%
170−180
+262%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Counter-Strike 2 85
−253%
300−310
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Far Cry 5 52
−265%
190−200
+265%
Fortnite 70−75
−261%
260−270
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−258%
190−200
+258%
Palworld 49
−267%
180−190
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
Valorant 100−110
−267%
400−450
+267%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Counter-Strike 2 42
−257%
150−160
+257%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−241%
600−650
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Far Cry 5 47
−262%
170−180
+262%
Fortnite 70−75
−261%
260−270
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−258%
190−200
+258%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
−264%
160−170
+264%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Palworld 28
−257%
100−105
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−255%
220−230
+255%
Valorant 137
−265%
500−550
+265%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Far Cry 5 44
−264%
160−170
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−258%
190−200
+258%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−257%
100−105
+257%
Valorant 100−110
−267%
400−450
+267%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
−261%
260−270
+261%
Palworld 27
−252%
95−100
+252%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−223%
300−310
+223%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
−261%
65−70
+261%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−267%
290−300
+267%
Valorant 114
−251%
400−450
+251%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry 5 37
−251%
130−140
+251%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Palworld 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Palworld 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Valorant 55−60
−256%
210−220
+256%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Palworld 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and Arc Pro B70 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B70 is 259% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B70 is 254% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Pro B70 is 268% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.33 45.44
Recency 24 September 2024 26 March 2026
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 67% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Pro B70, on the other hand, has a 269% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Arc Pro B70 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B70 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 19 votes

Rate Arc Pro B70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Arc Pro B70, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.