GeForce GTX 260 216 vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking479not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGT200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)16 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7216
Core clock speedno data576 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data182 Watt
Texture fill rateno data41.47
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPsno data28
TMUsno data72
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB896 MB
Memory bus widthno data448 Bit
Memory clock speedno data999 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data111.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 16 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 3 nm 65 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1729% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.