Radeon HD 8650M vs Arc Graphics 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon HD 8650M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 130T outperforms HD 8650M by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 401 | 969 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | GCN (2012−2015) |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 7 January 2013 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 900 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 28 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 4500 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 11.1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 30
+900%
| 3−4
−900%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+2667%
|
3−4
−2667%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+1500%
|
4−5
−1500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+2667%
|
3−4
−2667%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+1125%
|
4−5
−1125%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
+950%
|
8−9
−950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+520%
|
10−11
−520%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+1075%
|
4−5
−1075%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+400%
|
10−12
−400%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+208%
|
35−40
−208%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+1500%
|
4−5
−1500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+2667%
|
3−4
−2667%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
+408%
|
35−40
−408%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+1125%
|
4−5
−1125%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
+950%
|
8−9
−950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+520%
|
10−11
−520%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+1075%
|
4−5
−1075%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+933%
|
3−4
−933%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+400%
|
10−12
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+208%
|
35−40
−208%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+1500%
|
4−5
−1500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+1125%
|
4−5
−1125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+520%
|
10−11
−520%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+400%
|
10−12
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 80−85
+950%
|
8−9
−950%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+746%
|
12−14
−746%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+756%
|
16−18
−756%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+740%
|
5−6
−740%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+1550%
|
2−3
−1550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+825%
|
4−5
−825%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+1000%
|
3−4
−1000%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+630%
|
10−11
−630%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
1440p
High
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130T and HD 8650M compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is 900% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 2667% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T performs better in 46 tests (88%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (12%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
