Arc Pro B390 vs Arc A770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 with Arc Pro B390, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770
2022, $329
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
32.04
+41.2%

A770 outperforms Pro B390 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.98no data
Power efficiency11.0221.94
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameDG2-512Panther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (3 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536
Core clock speed2100 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate614.4120.0
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs25648
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3212
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache16 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770 32.04
+41.2%
Arc Pro B390 22.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13347
+41.2%
Samples: 1775
Arc Pro B390 9453
Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
1440p59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
4K37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.23no data
1440p5.58no data
4K8.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 317
+44.1%
220−230
−44.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Palworld 127
+49.4%
85−90
−49.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 166
+50.9%
110−120
−50.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+47.5%
80−85
−47.5%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+42.1%
190−200
−42.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 117
+46.3%
80−85
−46.3%
Fortnite 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Palworld 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+44.4%
90−95
−44.4%
Valorant 200−210
+43.6%
140−150
−43.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+47.5%
80−85
−47.5%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+43%
100−105
−43%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+45.8%
190−200
−45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Far Cry 5 109
+45.3%
75−80
−45.3%
Fortnite 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+50%
70−75
−50%
Metro Exodus 113
+41.3%
80−85
−41.3%
Palworld 82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+44.4%
90−95
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+50.8%
130−140
−50.8%
Valorant 200−210
+43.6%
140−150
−43.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+47.5%
80−85
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Far Cry 5 104
+48.6%
70−75
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+44.4%
90−95
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Valorant 200−210
+43.6%
140−150
−43.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Palworld 79
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90
+50%
60−65
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+41.9%
160−170
−41.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Metro Exodus 71
+42%
50−55
−42%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Valorant 230−240
+45%
160−170
−45%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+43.3%
60−65
−43.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry 5 82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+50%
40−45
−50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Palworld 60
+50%
40−45
−50%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Metro Exodus 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Palworld 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+46%
50−55
−46%
Valorant 190−200
+49.2%
130−140
−49.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 49
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Palworld 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%

This is how Arc A770 and Arc Pro B390 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 46% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 48% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 54% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.04 22.69
Recency 12 October 2022 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A770 has a 41% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 181% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5529 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Pro B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770 or Arc Pro B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.