Arc Pro B60 vs Arc A580

Place in the ranking	224	166
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	39.64
Power efficiency	12.77	13.53
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code name	DG2-512	BMG-G21
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	10 October 2023 (2 years ago)	5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2560
Core clock speed	1700 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	2000 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	384.0	384.0
Floating-point processing power	12.29 TFLOPS	12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	80
TMUs	192	160
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	24	20
L2 Cache	8 MB	10 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A580 28.89

Arc Pro B60 34.99
+21.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 12036
Samples: 338

Arc Pro B60 14579
+21.1%

Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
1440p	56 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%
4K	33 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.16
1440p	no data	7.68
4K	no data	14.26

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	331 −20.8%	400−450 +20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	73 −16.4%	85−90 +16.4%
Palworld	112 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	131 −14.5%	150−160 +14.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	110−120 −18.2%	130−140 +18.2%
Counter-Strike 2	263 −14.1%	300−310 +14.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	134 −19.4%	160−170 +19.4%
Fortnite	130−140 −17.6%	160−170 +17.6%
Forza Horizon 4	107 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Palworld	95 −15.8%	110−120 +15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
Valorant	180−190 −17%	220−230 +17%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	110−120 −18.2%	130−140 +18.2%
Counter-Strike 2	129 −16.3%	150−160 +16.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 −9.9%	300−310 +9.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 −14%	65−70 +14%
Far Cry 5	122 −14.8%	140−150 +14.8%
Fortnite	130−140 −17.6%	160−170 +17.6%
Forza Horizon 4	102 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 −16.3%	100−105 +16.3%
Metro Exodus	97 −13.4%	110−120 +13.4%
Palworld	74 −14.9%	85−90 +14.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	174 −20.7%	210−220 +20.7%
Valorant	180−190 −17%	220−230 +17%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120 −18.2%	130−140 +18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	53 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%
Far Cry 5	114 −14%	130−140 +14%
Forza Horizon 4	87 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%
Valorant	180−190 −17%	220−230 +17%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	130−140 −17.6%	160−170 +17.6%
Palworld	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	80 −18.8%	95−100 +18.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 −16.5%	240−250 +16.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Metro Exodus	57 −14%	65−70 +14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −20%	210−220 +20%
Valorant	210−220 −18.7%	260−270 +18.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80 −20.3%	95−100 +20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	87 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
Forza Horizon 4	75 −20%	90−95 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	70−75 −16.4%	85−90 +16.4%
Palworld	49 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	19 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	38 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Metro Exodus	37 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Palworld	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	61 −14.8%	70−75 +14.8%
Valorant	170−180 −16.3%	200−210 +16.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	45−50 −19.6%	55−60 +19.6%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	47 −17%	55−60 +17%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Palworld	27 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

This is how Arc A580 and Arc Pro B60 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B60 is 17% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro B60 is 16% faster in 1440p
Arc Pro B60 is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.89	34.99
Recency	10 October 2023	5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	200 Watt

Arc A580 has 14% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has a 21% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.