GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Arc A550M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A550M with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4060 Ti outperforms A550M by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 283 | 58 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 50 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 78.95 |
| Power efficiency | 29.34 | 26.27 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | DG2-512 | AD106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2022 (4 years ago) | 18 May 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 4352 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 2310 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,700 million | 22,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 262.4 | 344.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.397 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 136 |
| Tensor Cores | 256 | 136 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 34 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 240 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 150−160
+138%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140 | 300−310
+131%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | 110−120
+120%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 50−55 | 120−130
+122%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 150−160
+138%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95 | 220−230
+137%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140 | 300−310
+131%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | 110−120
+120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | 180−190
+137%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120 | 270−280
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95 | 210−220
+128%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95 | 210−220
+133%
|
| Valorant | 160−170 | 350−400
+117%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 60−65 | 150−160
+138%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95 | 220−230
+137%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140 | 300−310
+131%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260 | 600−650
+137%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | 110−120
+120%
|
| Dota 2 | 120−130 | 280−290
+133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | 180−190
+137%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120 | 270−280
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95 | 210−220
+128%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85 | 200−210
+138%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55 | 120−130
+135%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95 | 210−220
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70 | 160−170
+135%
|
| Valorant | 160−170 | 350−400
+117%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95 | 220−230
+137%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | 110−120
+120%
|
| Dota 2 | 120−130 | 280−290
+133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | 180−190
+137%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95 | 210−220
+128%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95 | 210−220
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70 | 160−170
+135%
|
| Valorant | 160−170 | 350−400
+117%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120 | 270−280
+133%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 110−120
+124%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170 | 350−400
+112%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45 | 100−105
+138%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | 70−75
+126%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 400−450
+130%
|
| Valorant | 180−190 | 400−450
+113%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70 | 150−160
+131%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 50−55
+117%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55 | 120−130
+126%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 140−150
+137%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40 | 85−90
+130%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 130−140
+136%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 18−20 | 40−45
+122%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 50−55
+117%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45 | 100−105
+133%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20−22 | 45−50
+125%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35 | 80−85
+135%
|
| Valorant | 120−130 | 300−310
+136%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 85−90
+136%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 50−55
+117%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 21−24
+110%
|
| Dota 2 | 75−80 | 180−190
+134%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 60−65
+122%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45 | 95−100
+132%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27 | 55−60
+129%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27 | 55−60
+120%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.71 | 54.23 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
Arc A550M has 63% lower power consumption.
RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 139% higher aggregate performance score, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.
Be aware that Arc A550M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
