Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Arc A530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.84no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameDG2-256Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2023 (3 years ago)15 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364480
Core clock speed900 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8707.0
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48128
TMUs96280
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores1270
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2023 15 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 281 Watt

Arc A530M has 77% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 83% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A530M and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A530M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 230 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A530M or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.