FirePro V5900 vs Arc A350M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A350M with FirePro V5900, including specs and performance data.
A350M outperforms V5900 by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 425 | 846 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 41.09 | 2.93 |
| Architecture | Xe-HPG (2022−2024) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | DG2-128 | Cayman |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2022 (4 years ago) | 24 May 2011 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 2,640 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 105.6 | 19.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 32 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 230 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36
+414%
| 7−8
−414%
|
| 1440p | 17
+467%
| 3−4
−467%
|
| 4K | 9
+800%
| 1−2
−800%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+429%
|
14−16
−429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27
+440%
|
5−6
−440%
|
| Palworld | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+392%
|
12−14
−392%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+429%
|
14−16
−429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 19
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 42
+425%
|
8−9
−425%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+381%
|
16−18
−381%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+375%
|
12−14
−375%
|
| Palworld | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+390%
|
10−11
−390%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+375%
|
24−27
−375%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+392%
|
12−14
−392%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+429%
|
14−16
−429%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+429%
|
35−40
−429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Dota 2 | 62
+417%
|
12−14
−417%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+388%
|
8−9
−388%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+381%
|
16−18
−381%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+375%
|
12−14
−375%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 26
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
| Palworld | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+390%
|
10−11
−390%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 43
+378%
|
9−10
−378%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+375%
|
24−27
−375%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+392%
|
12−14
−392%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Dota 2 | 59
+392%
|
12−14
−392%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 37
+429%
|
7−8
−429%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+375%
|
12−14
−375%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+390%
|
10−11
−390%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 19
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+375%
|
24−27
−375%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+381%
|
16−18
−381%
|
| Palworld | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−105
+376%
|
21−24
−376%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+376%
|
21−24
−376%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+378%
|
27−30
−378%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+429%
|
7−8
−429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 25
+400%
|
5−6
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+371%
|
7−8
−371%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Palworld | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+433%
|
12−14
−433%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+390%
|
10−11
−390%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
| Palworld | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
This is how Arc A350M and FirePro V5900 compete in popular games:
- Arc A350M is 414% faster in 1080p
- Arc A350M is 467% faster in 1440p
- Arc A350M is 800% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.28 | 2.84 |
| Recency | 30 March 2022 | 24 May 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Arc A350M has a 368% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 567% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The Arc A350M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V5900 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
